EBITDA Bridge Calculator
Walk from net income to adjusted EBITDA with a full add-back schedule and waterfall chart. Perfect for quality-of-earnings analysis.
Add-backs
Adjusted EBITDA
$5,450,000
Reported EBITDA
$4,700,000
Total add-backs
$750,000
14% of adj. EBITDA
Bridge waterfall
| Net income | $2,500,000 |
| + Interest expense | $450,000 |
| + Income taxes | $800,000 |
| + Depreciation | $750,000 |
| + Amortization | $200,000 |
| EBITDA | $4,700,000 |
| + Owner compensation above market | $350,000 |
| + Legal settlement (one-time) | $180,000 |
| + Discontinued product line | $220,000 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $5,450,000 |
Your numbers never leave your browser. Tentt has no backend, no database, and no record of anything you type into this calculator — the math runs entirely on your device. Output is for illustrative modelling only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice; verify any number you intend to act on.
What is an EBITDA bridge?
An EBITDA bridge — sometimes called an EBITDA walk or a quality-of-earnings reconciliation — is the line-by-line derivation of a company's "adjusted EBITDA" number from its reported net income at the bottom of the P&L. It is the single most scrutinised exhibit in middle-market M&A diligence, because every dollar that ends up in the adjusted number multiplies through the deal multiple and becomes additional purchase price. On a typical 7x EBITDA deal, a $400,000 line item — a one-time legal settlement, a discontinued product, an owner driving the family Range Rover on the company books — becomes $2.8 million of valuation. The seller and the buyer spend more time arguing about the bridge than about any other single number in the diligence process.
Despite how central the bridge is to every M&A deal, no free interactive web tool existed for building one before this calculator. Every search result is either an educational article from Wall Street Prep, a downloadable Excel template gated behind an email signup, or a paid-only feature of an enterprise diligence platform. This page fills that gap with a calculator that runs entirely in your browser, accepts unlimited add-back rows, flags aggressive normalisation patterns, and emits a clean waterfall ready to drop into a CIM exhibit or a diligence memo.
The standard bridge formula
The first half of the bridge is mechanical: net income plus the four canonical EBITDA add-backs (interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) gives you reported EBITDA. This is a GAAP-derivable number and there is nothing to argue about.
Reported EBITDA
EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization
The second half is where the work happens. Adjusted EBITDA layers on "normalisation" add-backs that management argues are not representative of the company's run-rate earnings power. Each add-back falls into one of four standard categories: non-recurring items (one-time legal settlements, restructuring, transaction fees), owner-related items (above-market compensation, personal expenses, family members on payroll), stock-based compensation (sometimes contested), and "other" normalisations (discontinued product lines, lost-profit-from-COVID arguments, out-of-period revenue catches).
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA = EBITDA + Non-recurring + Owner add-backs + Other normalisations
Worked example
Worked example
A specialty chemicals distributor reports $2,500,000 of net income. The 10-K shows $450,000 of interest expense, $800,000 of income taxes, $750,000 of depreciation, and $200,000 of amortization. Reported EBITDA is therefore $4,700,000.
The seller proposes three add-backs: $350,000 of owner compensation above the market replacement rate for a CEO, $180,000 for a one-time legal settlement that closed in Q3, and $220,000 of losses from a discontinued specialty product line that the buyer will not inherit. Total add-backs: $750,000. Adjusted EBITDA: $5,450,000.
At a 7x deal multiple, the bridge has added $5.25 million of enterprise value ($750k × 7) on top of the reported-EBITDA valuation. Add-backs are 16% of reported EBITDA — within the safe zone, below the 20% threshold where most QoE providers start asking pointed questions.
Defensible vs aggressive add-backs
Quality-of-earnings providers see thousands of bridges a year and have very strong opinions about which add-backs survive scrutiny. The defensible items are: documented one-time legal settlements that have already been paid, restructuring costs with associated severance agreements on file, M&A and capital-raise transaction fees with invoices, owner compensation above an independently benchmarked market rate, family members on payroll who perform no work, personal expenses run through the business with documentation, and discontinued product lines that the buyer will not assume.
The aggressive items that QoE providers consistently reject are: "lost profits" from any prior difficult period, expected future synergies from M&A that has not yet happened, growth investments reclassified as non-recurring (R&D, sales-team build-outs, marketing campaigns), one-time customer wins treated as recurring revenue, and any add-back without contemporaneous documentation. The calculator above flags any bridge where add-backs exceed 20% of reported EBITDA — that threshold roughly maps to the level at which institutional buyers will require independent QoE verification.
The bridge is the input to the deal multiple in a sell- side process, so the next step in any diligence workflow is usually feeding the adjusted number into the DCF calculator for a standalone valuation, the LBO calculator for a sponsor returns analysis, and the accretion / dilution calculator for a strategic-buyer EPS impact assessment.
Frequently asked questions
- What is an EBITDA bridge?
- An EBITDA bridge is the line-by-line walk from a company's reported net income up to its adjusted EBITDA. The standard bridge adds back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization to get to reported EBITDA, then layers on non-recurring items, owner add-backs, and other normalisations to arrive at adjusted EBITDA. The bridge is the single most-scrutinised exhibit in any quality-of-earnings report and any sell-side confidential information memorandum.
- What is the difference between EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA?
- Reported EBITDA is net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization — a clean GAAP-derivable number. Adjusted EBITDA layers on add-backs for items management considers non-recurring or non-representative of normalised earnings power: legal settlements, restructuring costs, pandemic-related expenses, owner compensation above market, discontinued product lines, M&A transaction fees. The gap between the two is where buyers and sellers spend most of their diligence time, because every dollar of adjustment is a dollar of valuation at the deal multiple.
- What add-backs are reasonable?
- The defensible add-backs in most QoE reports are: legal settlements that will not recur, restructuring costs (severance, facility closure, system migrations), one-time M&A and capital-raise transaction fees, pandemic-era PPP loan forgiveness, owner compensation above market replacement, family members on payroll who do not work in the business, personal expenses run through the company, discontinued product lines and divisions, and stock-based compensation (sometimes — buyers disagree on this). Aggressive add-backs that QoE providers reject include 'lost profits from a difficult year', expected synergies from future M&A, and growth investments treated as non-recurring.
- What is the EBITDA quality ratio?
- Adjusted EBITDA divided by reported EBITDA — or in some QoE reports, the percentage of adjusted EBITDA that comes from add-backs rather than core operations. A bridge where add-backs exceed 20% of reported EBITDA is a yellow flag. Above 30%, most institutional buyers will require independent QoE verification before accepting any of the adjustments. Above 50%, the adjusted EBITDA number is functionally a different number than reported EBITDA and any valuation built on it is largely a fiction.
- Why do sellers prefer adjusted EBITDA?
- Because adjusted EBITDA × deal multiple = enterprise value, and adjusted EBITDA is almost always higher than reported EBITDA. On a 7x multiple, a $400k add-back becomes $2.8M of additional purchase price. This is why sell-side advisors invest heavily in building a defensible bridge before a process launches — every legitimate add-back drops to the seller's pocket at close, and every disputed add-back becomes a price negotiation between buyer and seller during diligence.
- When is EBITDA the wrong metric?
- EBITDA is a poor metric for capital-intensive businesses where depreciation reflects real economic asset consumption (railroads, hotels, real estate, oil and gas), for businesses with material working capital swings (project-based services, contract manufacturing), and for any business where the add-backs exceed the reported number. The standard middle-market alternatives are EBITDA-CapEx, free cash flow, and 'cash EBITDA' which adjusts for working capital and maintenance capex.
